Reconciliation and
the Cross
By Salim J. Munayer,
PhD
The cross
has a unique role and function in this land where 2,000 years ago, Jesus was
crucified. Followers of Christ in Palestinian areas and Israel are essentially
a minority amidst the Jewish and Muslim majorities. As so much of this region
is defined by the conflict between groups, believers in Jesus look to Him as a
basis for reconciliation. While Muslims and Jews reject the cross, believers
who pursue reconciliation are seeking to fulfill Christ’s prayer for unity in
John 17:21, so that their testimony of unity will reflect His work of
reconciliation.
The
conflict between Israelis and Palestinians is multi-faceted and intractable.
The reality of the situation is that Israeli and Palestinians live in close
proximity, in one land. At the end of the day, there is no choice but to live
side-by-side; therefore cooperation, reconciliation and relationships are
essential. While peace accords have attempted to work out a solution, the
political solutions have failed to mend inter-group relations, or to alter
attitudes of hatred and prejudice that continuously undermine political
agreements and fuel the cycle of violence. Both sides are emotionally charged
by their pain and enmity. While hammering out a way for them to share the land,
the political process has not induced the change of heart required to live
alongside each other.
This is the
context in which Palestinian Arab Christians and Messianic Israeli Jews find
themselves. Believers live on both sides of the conflict, and are not immune to
its impact. None are untouched by the tide of prejudice and hostility between
groups, and the gap between people, including believers, continues to widen.
While violent conflict, political ideologies and theological disparities cause
divisions, followers of Jesus are compelled to address these issues in the
context of the cross.
Christ’s
act on the cross, God extending an act of reconciliation towards us, compels us
to reconcile with others. The Gospel provides a resource and a framework
through which to approach the other and the enemy. On the basis of the cross,
leaders and lay persons from the Messianic Israeli and Palestinian Christian
communities have been coming together to live out the mandate for
reconciliation. Through organizations like Musalaha, a non-profit that
facilitates reconciliation programs between Palestinians and Israelis, believers
meet in desert encounters and conferences, in order to face the challenge of
practicing these Biblical principles in the midst of conflict. (For more
information on Musalaha, see www.musalaha.org.) In our experiences at Musalaha encounters, a variety of
issues and obstacles to reconciliation continuously emerge, particularly
regarding issues such as identity, power imbalance, justice, prejudice, hatred
and revenge. This chapter/article discusses these trends, and the manner in
which the cross models a response to these challenges.
The Cross as
Atonement for Sin
The cross is a central
theme in reconciliation. I John 4:7 describes the nature of God as love, a love
made apparent through Christ’s act on the cross. He is love not only in his
identity but also in his act of sending his son as an atonement for our sin (I
John 4:10). This basic principle is important as the foundation of Biblical
reconciliation. God loves and embraces a world that rebels against him. All of
humanity is sinful and in enmity with God, yet he declares through the cross
that he wants a relationship with us that is intimate and eternal. God’s act of
embrace towards sinners enables us to have a relationship with him, which in
turn provides a mandate for us to embrace others.
This act on the cross not only impacts us personally and
individually, but also informs our relationships and attitudes towards others.
Each of us belongs to various communities, ethnic, cultural, religious
backgrounds and is influenced by the attitudes that our group might hold towards
other groups. In the case of Israelis and Palestinians, as their histories
intertwine in often painful and complex ways, attitudes of hatred, prejudice,
separation are f the other side.
Attitudes towards the other reflect deep-seated dehumanization and demonization. Dehumanization
disregards the humanity of the other side. Palestinians and Israelis often see
one another as the enemy, and not as a people with lives and families. Each
group demonizes the other side, relating to the enemy using religious language,
portraying them as the instrument of the devil, as being beyond redemption.
The act of Christ on the cross
rejects these attitudes. God’s grace, just as it extends to us in our sinful
state, extends to our enemies as well, for we were all once sinners and enemies
of God. When he could reject the human race, he looks on us with love and
redeems us. His act of atonement and embrace is our model and point of
reference in reconciling with each other.
The Cross as
Deliverance
Solidarity with
human condition of suffering
Christ, through his
life, death and resurrection, identifies with those who suffer and are
oppressed. Jesus recalled, “He has anointed me to preach the Gospel to the
poor…to heal the brokenhearted. To proclaim liberated to the captives and
recovery of sight to the blind. To set at liberty those who those who are
oppressed.” (Luke 4:18-19). Christ brings deliverance in several aspects of
human life, including the spiritual, social, physical life of the victim.
Jesus’
experience of suffering and his teachings concerning the sufferer compel us to
attitudes of compassion, even towards our enemies. His sympathy towards the
victim is not only a comfort to those who suffer, but also a demand for the same
from us. In a conflict where both sides see themselves as the victims, often
groups are unable to see the suffering of the other side. A victimization
mentality blinds one group to the suffering of the other. While also being a
source of redemption and relief, the cross presents a challenge to look beyond
our own situation and to attend to the suffering and pain of others. God is
calling us to be like him, to have solidarity in suffering and bring freedom to
the oppressed.
Cross as liberation
from the roles of victim and oppressor
The trends of victimization and oppression are major factors in the
Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Both Israelis
and Palestinian strongly perceive themselves as victims, and therefore have
difficulty seeing themselves as a threat to the other. If we are the victims,
then we cannot be the victimizers. This monopoly on victimization fails to
acknowledge that each side has also played the role of perpetrator. Perceived
victimization can become a justification and excuse for violent and sinful acts.
In addition, victimization can also lead to a fatalistic point of view. The parties believe
that nothing can be done to change the enemy who is full of hatred and wants
only to destroy. This justifies the use of power and pre-emptive violence for
perceived self-preservation.
The cross
addresses this dynamic by redefining the roles of victim and oppressor. In as
much as Christ’s death addresses the victim, it also deals with the oppressor.
Just as God showed his love and liberated the oppressed, the oppressor is also
set free in the cross.
Both
oppressor and oppressed are liberated from the cycles of conflict. We are often
caught in arguments and a vicious cycle of competing narratives and of diverging
perceptions of truth and justice. This can lead to violence that ends in a
cycle of more violence and revenge. After time the cycle becomes messy and
people forget origins and main issues of the conflict. The cross can help us to
avoid entering into this cycle, because in him on the cross is all truth and
justice.
In the cross we see the reality of our own injustice, shortcomings
and contribution to the conflict. The cross opens the way to changing
perceptions of others that divert us from the cycle of revenge and retaliation.
“Vengeance is mine,” says the Lord. He will administer retaliation and
justice. It is fundamental to recognize that God, who knows and sees all, takes
upon himself role of the judge. If we take on the task of judgment, we are
assuming the role and authority of God. By taking upon himself the revenge and
punishment of evil, God frees us from focusing our life on hatred and vengeance,
from a life that is damaging to ourselves and others. This is an important
aspect of breaking the cycle of retaliation, because we are set free from the
bondage of thinking about the injustice we incur and also the justice we
deserve. In Middle Eastern history, for lack of central authority, families
took on the role of administering justice, thus making vengeance a strong
element in the culture. The cross brings an alternative message of God as the
instrument of justice. Through the cross, we are liberated from the feelings of
injustice and victimization mentality, and come to recognize areas where we too
deserve God’s wrath and judgment.
In
receiving freedom through the cross as either the victim or oppressor, we can be
engaged with imitating what God did for us. After we are transformed, we can
become a part of transformative relationships. Receiving what Christ did on the
cross for each one of us, frees both sides to engage with the other in an act of
love and embrace. Through forgiveness and confession, both the oppressor and
the oppressed are released, and through this freedom we can be involved in
developing relationship and building up community.
The cross changes
and transforms identity.
The issues of identity
and belonging to a group are major aspects of the conflict. Identity greatly
influences how parties relate to one another and behave towards each other. In
our context, religion is a major factor in defining our identity, separating
between Christian, Jew and Muslim, and plays an important role in the
interaction between groups.
The cross not only sets us free
from our identities as sinners and from the roles of victim or oppressor, but
also brings security to our own identity, a freedom that liberates us to embrace
and accept others. The perfect love that casts out fear (I John 4:18) protects
us from guilt or fear of sin, also projects us from fear of rejection and brings
security. This is significant in a conflict where there are major struggles and
insecurities concerning identity and rejection of the other.
Determining
identity can also be a political statement and can be seen as affirming or
denying one’s existence. The dynamic between weak and powerful plays a role in
determining identity. The weak may feel the need to define themselves in a
certain way in order to appease the strong for reasons of survival, prosperity
and access to power. As a result, they may deny elements of their background
identity. This is a common struggle for the Palestinian Arab citizens of
Israel. In the eyes of some, the word Palestinian is a political statement that
might be threatening.
In
contrast, the cross frees us to be who we are because it affirms God’s love for
creation and humanity. We have been created in God’s image and likeness, as
Arab, Jewish, Israeli or Palestinian. The Bible assures us of God’s love for
all, and says that, “There is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor
female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus” (Gal. 3:28). However, these
boundaries do not cease to exist and the characteristics of Jew and Greek or man
and woman are not removed but rather transformed according to God’s purposes.
We can
acquire an understanding of our identity that is complementary and not
contradictory to the behavior and identity of others. The cross that give us
freedom to be ourselves also gives security and freedom to engage with others;
and as we engage with others, just as when we encounter God, the encounter is
transformative.
There are
those aspects of our identity that require transformation. While parts of our
identity are positive expressions of culture, tradition, and rich history, at
the same time, our identification with a group can mean adopting certain
negative attitudes towards the other. Social identity theory claims that when
we categorize ourselves in one group, this often results in specific feelings or
discrimination towards those outside the group. Thus, as we identify with a
group, we take on certain attitudes that confirm our identity and self-esteem.
There is
the tendency to distinguish between “us”
and “them,” and to evaluate one’s own group with sensitivity and favor. We
are able to understand our own group, recognize its good qualities, and become
attached to it. We overlook our own shortcomings because it is important to
distinguish between us (who are right and good and merciful) and them (who are
evil and wrong).
At the same time, we can fail to see
plurality within other side. We generalize and stereotype the other, saying
things like, ‘They all hate and want to kill us,’ or ‘They are the animals, they
are the evil ones.’ We are unable to see them as individuals with unique
feelings and thoughts as God created them. While we understand and perhaps accept the variety of feeling and opinion
within our own group, we do not recognize the debates and disagreements within
the other group. Rather, we see them as one group united together against us.
Palestinians feel that all Israelis are the same and cannot be
trusted. Israelis feel that all Palestinians are the same and cannot be
trusted. Suspicion and mistrust run
high. It is easy to develop a ‘conspiracy complex,’ anticipating that ‘they’
are conspiring to harm us.
The cross challenges these attitudes and provides a firm alternative to the
division between us and them. It offers a new way of viewing identity. First
we see our own identity transformed as we are atoned and redeemed, and now are
given new eyes to understand the other, who is offered the same grace and same
transformed identity.
Ephesians 2 is a key passage relating identity, inter-group attitudes and ethnic
conflict. As stated in verses 14-16, the cross created one new man from the
two. He is not demanding that Israelis and Palestinians give up their
identity. As a matter of fact, the two groups are needed to make a third
identity, a new man, the new community of the people of God. So often in group
relationships, there is a denial and rejection of the other’s identity. One
group puts demands on the other to submit or to conform their identity to the
wishes of the other. Aspects of culture, heritage and history are suppressed
because they are uncomfortable or different. Here in Ephesians, Paul is saying
bring your identity with you to the cross because it is transformed in Jesus to
create a new community of the people of God, where each person contributes from
the richness of their identity. As a result, both groups will experience peace
because both are reconciled to God in one body through the cross.
Cross transforms our
attitude toward the other
In this act of
reconciliation, Christ put to death our hostility and enmity, and he does so by
bringing people together. Interdependency exists in our reconciliation to God.
We are dependent on each other to end the hostility that is between our groups
and within ourselves. There is a solidarity in sinfulness and a solidarity in
redemption. Our identities are transformed in relationship and not in
separation. When coming to the foot of the cross, we require each other in
order to deal with the hostility within our own hearts and to establish peace.
Ephesians 2
confronts the hostility that exists in inter-group relationships. While it
addresses enmity on the individual or personal level, this passage also deals
with enmity between groups; in our case, the hatred that exists between two
nations in a violent struggle over land. In verse 11, Paul talks about
relationships between Jews and non-Jews in the early church. In the days before
the early church, Jews did not look on non-Jews favorably, calling them names
and viewing them as outsiders; them and us. Between the communities there was
alienation, rejection, lack of belonging. Paul declaration that what brought
the two people together was not a change that happened among them, but first the
act of Jesus on the cross. By the sacrificial act of Christ, those “who once
were far off have been brought near by the blood of Christ” (v. 13).
People who did not experience God’s actions and blessing in history are now
brought inside.
The cross creates a new community
Peace comes not as a
new ideology or politics, but is the result of the identity and action of Jesus.
One aspect of peace in Ephesians 2 is the peace that humanity has with God as a
result of his forgiveness. Another aspect of peace is the end of separation or
strife between groups. This peace comes as a result of people uniting through
the spirit of God that cleanses us from sin, and brings us both to the Father.
Peace in humanity is integrally related to humanity’s peace with God.
For us as Israeli and Palestinian believers this means an end to our
hostility toward each other. We are no longer strangers, and cannot desire to
destroy the other group. Now we are equals, on the same level and part of the
same family, all together under the judgment and grace of God. This unity
diffuses the tension by adding a new aspect to our identity as Palestinians or
Israelis. Our new identity as the people of God brings us together as a
community that embraces rather than rejects one another. We are fellow citizens
(v. 19).
Our unity has the purpose of building a dwelling place of God in the
Spirit. We are all given different roles, in order to meet that purpose. In
essence the cross, by removing the dividing wall of hostility, enables groups to
move forward toward cooperation.
Our transformed identity, our belonging to a new kingdom, is
liberating. Our identity is secure because we are the beloved and forgiven of
God. We can be engaged, because of the freedom and security received in the
cross, in self-giving, that is an imitation of Christ. It removes us from the
cycle of revenge because we now view the oppressed and oppressors from a new
perspective. There will always be different views, historical narratives will
clash, and theological understandings will not concur. What will change are the
ways in which understanding the other and our attitudes towards them. No longer
will we maintain the selfish, victimized identity, but we are liberated and
secure to interact with the other. Without this interaction, there will not be
transformation or an end to the hostility within each of us. Relationships with
the crucified Lord and with each other are the foundations for ending hatred and
bringing healing and unity.
In our Middle Eastern context, as
Paul said, we continue to “preach Christ crucified: a stumbling block to Jews
and foolishness to Gentiles,” (I Cor 1:23). Although the majority groups of
Muslims and Jews both reject the cross, through our ability to reconcile
believers we continue to demonstrate his act of embrace by coming together and
embracing one another in reconciliation.
|